Гадаад хэл сурах үеийн алдаа, үүнд хандах багш суралцагчийн хандлага
A Study of Teachers’ and Students’ Attitudes towards Error Correction in the L2 class
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22353/MJFLC2017118Keywords:
алдаа, алдааны шинжилгээ, багшийн хандлага, суралцагчийн хандлагаAbstract
Foreign language education has been developing as an interdisciplinary field of linguistics, education, and psychology and many studies have been done, such as teachers’ and students’ perceptions towards teaching and learning activities, curriculum, teaching and learning materials as well as a teacher development. This study investigated teachers’ and learners’ attitudes towards error correction, including the necessity, frequency, timing, type, method, and delivering agent of error treatment. One hundred sixty adult foreign language students and 25 teachers in three departments at Humanities Division, School of Arts and Sciences, National University of Mongolia participated in the surveys. The student participants’ proficiency levels varied from low intermediate to advanced.
The results revealed that both the teachers and students agreed that student errors should be treated, but students wanted more correction than their teachers thought. The teachers and students had significantly different opinions about timing, method, and delivering agents of error correction, as well as types of errors that need to be corrected.
References
Монголоор
Г.Буяннэмэх, Д.Сайнбилэгт, Ц.Дэлгэрэхцэцэг, Б.Даваасүрэн, Н.Оюунзаяа, Ц.Энхмаа, Г.Бат- Учрал, Б.Наранчимэг, М.Чаминцэцэг. (2016). Англи Монгол хэлний боловсрролын нэр томьёоны хэлхээс, Удам соёл хэвлэлийн газар, УБ.
Англиар
Akemi Katayama (2006)., Learners’ perceptions toward oral error correction, In K. Bradford-Watts (Ed.), JALT2006 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT.
Amara Naimi., Errors Correction in Foreign Language Teaching, The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education – July 2015 Volume 5, Issue 3.
Chamintsetseg.M. (2011)., Error Analysis on Mongolian English Learners’ Writing, Thesis, Department of English language and linguistics, Chonbuk National University.
Corder. C. (1981). Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Oxford University Press.
Corder. C. (1984), Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition, London: Longman
David Lasagabaster and Juan Manuel Sierra., Error Correction: Students’ Versus Teachers’
Perceptions, Language awareness, Vol. 14, No. 2&3, 2005.
Douglas Brown (2004). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, 5thEdition, Pearson Education.
Edj.J (1989). Mistakes and Correction. London: Longman.
Galina Kavaliauskienė, Lilija Anusienė (2012)., Case study: Learner attitudes towards the correction of mistakes, Social Technologies. 2012, 2(1): 88–101.
Hyang-Sook Park (2010)., Teachers’and learners’ preferences for error correction, Thesis, Department of Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages, California State University, Sacramento.
James M. Hendrickson (1978)., Error Correction in Foreign Language Teaching: Recent Theory, Research, and Practice, The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 62, No. 8. (Dec., 1978), pp. 387-398.
Kerwin A. Livingstone (2015)., Correcting errors in the L2 classroom: students’ and teachers’
perceptions, online journal, Portugal.
Richards James. (1974). Error Analysis. Longman. London and New York.
Roger Cohen. (2005)., English in Mongolia, “World Englishes”, vol 24, No 2. pp. 203-216.
Tom Scovel. (2001). Learning New Languages: A Guide to Second Language Acquisition
Viktor Albart Francis. (2011)., Error correction in second language writing: Teachers’ beliefs, practices and and students’ preferences, Master’s research, Queensland University of Technology, Faculty of Education.
Weinreich.U “Languages in contact” 1972.
