Qaraqorum’s Afterlife: Centres and Peripheries in the late Yuan and early Ming Periods

Main Article Content

Francesca Fiaschetti

Abstract

The capital of the Mongol Empire, due to its favourable location, was not only the symbolic centre of power for the medieval Mongols, but also performed several key functions in the political, economic, and military administration of the empire. Throughout the thirteenth century, and even after the city's decline in the fourteenth century, its strategic and ideological value remained undisputed. Control of the region around Qaraqorum, therefore, became a prerogative for all those who wanted to dominate the Yuan territories and claim the legacy of the Mongol empire. By examining some Chinese sources of the period, the article shows how shaping a linkage with Mongolia, in terms of symbolic geography as well as words of power, remained a fundamental priority of the emperors ruling over East Asia well beyond the mid-fourteenth century and the end of the Yuan dynasty.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fiaschetti, F. (2022). Qaraqorum’s Afterlife: Centres and Peripheries in the late Yuan and early Ming Periods. Acta Mongolica, 20(540), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.22353/am.202201.05
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Francesca Fiaschetti, University of Vienna

University assistant postdoc for medieval history and historical auxiliary sciences 

References

F. W. Cleaves, “The Sino-Mongolian Inscrip-tion of 1346.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies Vol. 15, 1/2 (June 1952), 1-123. The translation is a slightly modified version of Cleaves’ translation: F. W. Cleaves, “Inscription of 1346”, p. 31.

S. Reichert, A layered history of Karakorum: stratigraphy and periodization in the city center, Bonn Contributions to Asian Archaeology 8 (Bonn: Vfgarch, 2019).

P. Jack-son and D. Morgan (eds.): The Mission of Friar William of Rubruck: his journey to the Great Khan Möngke. (London: Hakluyt Society, 1990), p. 209-216.

J. W. Dardess, “From Mongol Empire to Yüan Dynasty.” Monumenta Serica 30 (1972–1973), 117–65, esp. p. 118.

J. W. Dardess “From Mongol Empire”, p. 121.

M. Rossabi ed., Eurasian Influences on Yuan China (Singa-pore: ISEAS Publishing, 2013).

D. M. Robinson, In the Shadow of the Mongol Empire: Ming China and Eurasia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).

Hosung Shim, “The Postal Roads of the Great Khans in Central Asia under the Mongol-Yuan Empire.” Journal of Song-Yuan Studies 44 (2014), 405-69.

D. Robinson, In the Shadow of the Mongol Empire, p. 129-157.

Ch. Erikson, “Early Ming Imperial Ambitions: The Legacy of the Mongol Yuan in Spatial Representa-tions and Historical Judgements.” Frontiers of History in China Vol. 12/3 (2017), 465-84.

Ch. Erikson, “Early Ming Imperial Ambitions”, p. 471.

Ch. Erikson, “Early Ming Imperial Ambitions”, p. 473.

Zhao Shiyan 趙世延 and Yu Ji 虞集 (auth.), Zhou Shaochuan 周少川,Wei Xuntian, 魏訓田, Xie Hui謝輝 (eds.), Jingshi dadian jijiao 經世大典輯校 [Critical edition of the Compendium for Governing the World], (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2020), vol. 2, p. 331-332.

F. Hodous, “The Quriltai as a Legal Institution in the Mongol Empire.” Central Asiatic Journal 56 (2012/2013), 87-102.

J. W. Dardess, Conquerors and Confucians: Aspects of Political Change in Late Yüan China (New York: Columbia University Press, 1973). p. 31-51.

Most read articles by the same author(s)