Weak Heads at the Interface A View from Temporal Adverbial Clauses
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper proposes that weak heads in Chomsky’s (2015) sense are not only syntactically weak (i.e., unable to provide a label on their own), but also morpho-phonologically weak. To illustrate how this works, this paper examines temporal adverbial clauses (TACs) in Japanese, showing that the presence/absence of what we call Geis-ambiguity in Japanese TACs correlates with the presence/absence of yori ‘than’ in the clauses. Based on Miyamoto’s (1996) argument that this ambiguity arises due to operator movement, we propose that there is a covert weak head which hosts the relevant operator in its specifier. Crucially, the weak head in question can only be present in the presence of its morpho-phonological host, i.e., yori. We further demonstrate that this covert weak head, unlike an overt noun, cannot be referred to by a null resumptive element, and suggest that the weakness in the labeling sense could potentially lead to weakness at LF.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Andrews, Avery. 2007. Relative clauses. In Language typology and syntactic description, ed. by Timothy Shopen, Vol. II, 206–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arregui, Ana, and Kiyomi Kusumoto. 1998. Tense in temporal adjunct clauses. In Proceedings of SALT VIII, ed. by Devon Strolovitch and Aaron Lawson, 1–18. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Baker, Mark C. 2008. The macroparameters in a microparametric world. In The limits of syntactic variation, ed. by Theresa Biberauer, 351–374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Barbosa, Pilar P. 2019. Pro as a minimal nP: Toward a unified approach to pro-drop. Linguistic Inquiry 50: 487–526.
Belletti, Adriana. 2001. ‘Inversion’ as focalization. In Inversion in Romance and the theory of universal grammar, ed. by Aafke Hulk and Jean-Yves Pollock, 60–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In The structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, volume 2, ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric syntax. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications.
Bošković, Željko. 2014. Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 27–89.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49.
Chomsky, Noam. 2015. Problems of projection: Extensions. In Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, ed. by Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann, and Simona Matteini, 3–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chomsky, Noam. 2020. The UCLA lectures: With an introduction by Robert Freidin. https://lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/005485.
Chomsky, Noam. 2021. Minimalism: Where are we now, and where can we hope to go. Gengo Kenkyu 160: 1–41.
Citko, Barbara. 2011. Symmetry in syntax: Merge, Move, and Labels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Demirdache, Hamida, and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria. 2004. The syntax of time adverbs. In The syntax of time, ed. by Jacqueline Guéron and Jacqueline Lecarme, 143–179. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Demirdache, Hamida, and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria. 2013. The structure of spatial PPs and temporal interpretation. Talk given at 23rd Colloquium on Generative Grammar, Facultad de Filología, Universidad Complutense, Madrid. May 9-11.
Embick, David, and Alec Marantz. 2008. Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 1–53.
Fukui, Naoki. 1986. A theory of category projection and its application. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Fukui, Naoki. 1988. Deriving the differences between English and Japanese: A case study in parametric syntax. English Linguistics 5: 249–270.
Geis, Michael. 1970. Adverbial subordinate clauses in English. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Grimshaw, Jane. 2000. Locality and extended projections. In Lexical specification and insertion, ed. by Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert, and Jane Grimshaw, 183–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Grosu, Alexander. 2010. The status of internally-headed relatives of Japanese/Korean within the typology of definite relatives. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19:231–274.
Grosu, Alexander, and Hiroto Hoshi. 2016. Japanese internally headed relatives: Their distinctness from potentially homophonous constructions. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1:1–31.
Grosu, Alexander, and Fred Landman. 2012. A quantificational disclosure approach to Japanese and Korean internally headed relatives. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21:159–196.
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2016. NP-ellipsis: A comparative syntax of Japanese and Okinawan. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34: 1345–1387.
Hiraiwa, Ken, George Akanlig-Pare, Samuel Atintono, Adams Bodomo, Komlan Essizewa, and Fusheini
Hudu. 2017. A comparative syntax of internally-headed relative clauses in Gur. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2: 1–30.
Ishii, Yasuo. 1991. Operators and empty categories in Japanese. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Kikuchi, Akira. 1987. Comparative deletion in Japanese. Ms., Yamagata University.
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Landman, Fred. 2016. Japanese internally headed relatives: A hybrid analysis with Kuroda Functions. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1: 1–35.
Larson, Richard K. 1990. Extraction and multiple selection in PP. The Linguistic Review 7: 169–182.
Lasnik, Howard. 1981. Restricting the theory of transformations: A case study. In Explanation in linguistics, ed. by Norbert Hornstein and David Lightfoot, 152–173. London: Longmans.
Miyamoto, Yoichi. 1996. More on temporal adverbial clauses. In University of Connecticut working papers in linguistics 7: Papers in honor of Mamoru Saito, 185–197. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Morita, Hisashi. 2009. Covert pied-piping in Japanese wh-questions. English Linguistics 26: 374–393.
Murasugi, Keiko. 1991. Noun phrases in Japanese and English: A study in syntax, learnability and acquisition. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Murasugi, Keiko. 1992. Locative/temporal vs. manner/reason phrases. In Kinjo Gakuin Daigaku
Ronshu: Papers in English linguistics and literature, 233–242. Nagoya: Kinjo Gakuin University.
Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1990. Quantification in the theory of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ochi, Masao. 2019. Labeling Algorithm, agreement, and pro-form no in Japanese. In Proceedings of
WECOL 30, ed. by Trevor Driscoll, 151–161. Fresno, CA: Department of Linguistics, California State University.
Oda, Hiromune. 2022. The NP/DP-language distinction as a scale and parameters in minimalism. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Oda, Hiromune. 2024. Large-scale pied-piping in the labeling theory and conditions on weak heads. The Linguistic Review 41: 153-185.
Oda, Hiromune and Yuta Tatsumi. 2017a. Two types of Japanese “before” clauses. In Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics 8, ed. by Ayaka Sugawara, Shintaro Hayashi and Satoshi Ito, 87–96. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Oda, Hiromune and Yuta Tatsumi. 2017b. A non-unified analysis of “before” clauses in Japanese. In Proceedings of Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics 12, ed. by Leyla Zidani-Eroğlu, Matthew Ciscel, and Elena Koulidobrova, 243–254. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Perlmutter, David M. 1972. Evidence for shadow pronouns in French relativization. In The Chicago Which Hunt: Papers from the Relative Clause Festival, ed. by Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi, and Gloria C. Phrares, 73–105. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago.
Richards, Norvin. 2000. An island effect in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9: 187–205.
Richards, Norvin. 2016. Contiguity Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Richards, Norvin. To appear. Finding something to lean on. Language.
Roberts, Ian. 2019. Parameter hierarchy and Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saito, Mamoru. 1985. Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Saito, Mamoru. 2018. Kase as a weak head. In Heading in the right direction: Linguistic treats for Lisa Travis, McGill working papers in linguistics 25.1, ed. by Laura Kalin, Ileana Paul, and Jozina Vander Klok, 382–390. Montreal: McGill University.
Saito, Mamoru. 2024. Null arguments in EA languages revisited: Ellipsis or pronouns. In Proceedings of the 17th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics, ed. by Erdene-Ochir Tumen-Ochir, Julia
Sinitsyna, and Shigeru Miyagawa, 1–16. Cambridge, MA; MITWPL.
Sharvit, Yael. 2014. On the universal principles of tense embedding: The lesson from before. Journal of Semantics 31: 263–313.
Stjepanović, Sandra. 1999. What do second position cliticization, scrambling, and multiple wh-fronting have in common? Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Stjepanović, Sandra. 2003. A word order paradox resolved by copy deletion at PF. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 3: 139–177.
Sudo, Yasutada. 2015. Hidden nominal structures in Japanese clausal comparatives. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 24: 1–51.
Takita, Kensuke. 2020. Labeling for linearization. The Linguistic Review 37: 75–116.
Watanabe, Akira. 1992. Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1: 255–291.
Watanabe, Akira. 2003. Wh and operator constructions in Japanese. Lingua 113: 519–558.
Zanon, Ksenia. 2020. Focus association with ONLY in Russian, Chinese, and English. Talk given at the Cambridge Linguistics Society.