Glazed Ceramics from Qaraqorum Archaeological Evidence on Routes to the Old-Mongolian Capital

Main Article Content

Anne Sklebitz

Abstract

The Old-Mongolian capital Qaraqorum is described in historical sources as a vivid, international, and multicultural city with constant exchange and contacts across cultures. This is particularly so in a description that the Franciscan friar William of Rubruck made while visiting Qaraqorum in the year 1254. Rubruck noted that Muslim traders, Chinese craftsmen, Buddhists, Nestorian Christians as well as several European captives all lived and worked in Qaraqorum. Despite this, the city is seldom included on maps depicting Eurasian and Inner Asian travel and trade networks of the 13th–14th century. Such networks have left archaeological traces at various city sites, through the presence of imported ceramics, food, and other goods. This article will focus on the glazed ceramics excavated in Qaraqorum. The author classified the material and determined the production sites of the different wares. A chorological study based on this data expands our knowledge of connections to Qaraqorum in the medieval Asian trade network. The results are presented in this article. As every aspect of archaeological research reflects parts of the overall picture only, this study is meant to enable further research on the subject. This article is dedicated to the symposium “800 years Qaraqorum” and thus included in a broader research framework on the fascinating Old Mongolian capital.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sklebitz, A. (2022). Glazed Ceramics from Qaraqorum: Archaeological Evidence on Routes to the Old-Mongolian Capital. Acta Mongolica, 20(540), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.22353/am.202201.03
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Anne Sklebitz, Museum für Vor- und Frühgeschichte, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz,

Research Associate (Museum für Vor- und Frühgeschichte)

References

H.-G. Huettel and U. Erdenebat, Karabalgasun und Karakorum. Zwei spätnomadische Stadtsiedlun-gen im Orchon-Tal (Ulaanbaatar: Mongolyn Shinzhlėkh Ukhaany Akademi, 2009), 8.

Huettel and Erdenebat, Karabalgasun und Karakorum, p. 8.

H. Franke and D. C. Twitchett eds., The Cambridge History of China. Vol. 6. Alien Regimes and Bor-der States, 907–1368 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 347.

Franke and Twitchett, The Cambridge History of China, 341.

J. Bemmann, E. Pohl, B. Schütt and W. Schwanghart, “Archaeological Findings in the Upper and Middle Orkhon Valley and their Geographical Setup.” In Mongolian-German Karakorum Expedition Vol. 1. Excavations in the Craftsmen Quarter at the Main Road. eds. J. Bemmann, U. Erdenebat and E. Pohl (Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag, 2010), 307-19. p. 307.

M. Roesch, E. Fischer, T. Märkle and B. Oyuntuya, “Medieval Plant Remains from Karakorum, Mon-golia.” in Mongolian-German Karakorum Epedition Vol. 1. Excavations in the Craftsmen Quarter at the Main Road, eds.J. Bemmann, U. Erdenebat and E. Pohl(Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag, 2010), 219-49. esp. p. 233.

U. B. Barkmann, “Qara Qorum (Karakorum) – Fragmente zur Geschichte einer vergessenen Re-ichshauptstadt.” In Qara-Qorum-City (Mongolia) I. Preliminary Report of the excavations 2000/2001, eds. H. R. Roth, U. Erdenebat, E. Nagel and E. Pohl (Bonn: Bonn Institut of Pre- and Early Historical Archeology, 2002), 5-21. p. 14.

E. Pohl, “Interpretation without Excavation – Topographic Mapping on the Territory of the first Mon-golian Capital Karakorum.” in Current Archaeological Research in Mongolia. Papers from the First International Conference on “Archaeological Research in Mongolia” held in Ulaanbaatar, August 19th–23rd, 2007, eds. J. Bemmann, H. Parzinger, E. Pohl and D. Tseveendorzh (Bonn: Vor- und Frühgeschichtliche Archäologie, Rheinische Friedrich.Wilhems-Universität, 2009), 505-33. p. 514 with further references.

Franke and Twitchett, The Cambridge History of China, 616; J. D. Langlois ed., China under Mongol Rule (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981). p. 3.

Franke and Twitchett, The Cambridge History of China, p. 419, 454; Sh. McCausland, The Mongol Century. Visual Cultures of Yuan China, 1271–1368 (London: Reaction Books, 2014). p. 28.

Barkmann, “Qara Qorum (Karakorum)”, p. 17.

Franke and Twitchett, The Cambridge History of China, p. 445.

P. Olbricht ed., Zum Untergang zweier Reiche. Berichte von Augenzeugen aus den Jahren 1232-33 und 1368-70. Aus dem Chinesischen übersetzt von Erich Haenisch (Wiesbaden: Komissionsverlag F. Steiner, 1969). pp. 27-41.

E. Pohl, “Interpretation without Excavation”, p. 515.

W. R. Shepherd, The Historical Atlas (New York 1926).

Wilhelm von Rubruck, Reise zu den Mongolen. Von Konstantinopel nach Kaakorum. 1253–1255, ed. H. D. Leicht (Wiesbaden: Marixverlag GmbH, 2012).

Sir H. Yule ed., Cathay and the Way Thither. Vol. III. Missionary Friars: Rashiduddin, Pegolotti, Marignolli (Taipei: Ch’eng Wen Pub. Co., 1966).

A. Toepel, Die Mönche des Kublai Khan. Die Reise der Pilger Mar Yahballaha und Rabban Sauma nach Europa (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2008).

A. Sklebitz, Glazed Ceramics from Karakorum.The Distribution and Use of Chinese Ceramics in the Craftsmen Quarter of the Old-Mongolian Capital During the 13th–14th Century A. D. (Bonn, PhD Diss., 2018). Published online https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:5-50054.

M. Medley, The Chinese Potter. A Practical History of Chinese Ceramics (Singapore: 1989, Rprint: London: Phaidon, 2006). p. 104.

Wang Xie, “Yuandai jininglu gucheng yizhi chutu ciqi jiedu = The Interpretation of Ceramics Exca-vated from the Yuan Dynasty City Site of Jininglu”. Beifang Wenwu 3 (2008), pp. 54-6.

D. Heng, Sino-Malay Trade and Diplomacy from the Tenth through the Fourteenth Century (Athens: Ohio University Press, 2009); F. Gipouloux, The Asian Mediterranean. Port Cities and Trading Net-works in China, Japan and Southeast Asia, 13th –21st Century (Cheltonham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011).

Franke and Twitchett, The Cambridge History of China, p. 600, 612; McCausland, The Mongol Cen-tury, p. 15, 19.

M. Rossabi, “The Muslims in the Early Yüan Dynasty.” in China under Mongol Rule, ed. J. D. Lan-glois (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981), 257-95. p. 259.

Ch. Franken, Die Befunde der „Großen Halle“ von Karakorum. Die Ausgrabungen im sogenannten Palastbezirk (Bonn: PhD Diss., 2012). pp. 34-5.

E. Becker, “Die sowjetisch-mongolischen Ausgrabungen von 1948/49.” in Mongo-lian-German Karakorum Expedition Vol. 1. Excavations in the Craftsmen Quarter at the Main Road, eds. J. Bemmann, U. Erdenebat and E. Pohl (Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag, 2010), 27-38. p. 27.

Y. Konagaya and I. Elikhina, Some Archaeological Findings of the Mongolian-Soviet Expedition Led by S. V. Kiselev. Karakorum Settlement Relicts Stored in Hermitage Museum (Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, 2014) and I. Elikhina, “The Most Interesting Artefacts from Karako-rum in the Collection of the State Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg.” in

J. Bemmann, U. Erdenebat and E. Pohl eds., Mongolian-German Karakorum Expedition Vol. 1. Excavations in the Craftsmen Quarter at the Main Road. Forschungen zur Archäologie Außereuropäischer Kulturen 8 = Bonn Con-tributions to Asian Archaeology 2 (Wiesbaden 2010), 39-47.

E. Pohl, “The Excavations in the Chinese Craftsmen-Quarter of Karakorum (KAR-2) between 2000 and 2005 – Stratigraphy and Architecture.” in Mongolian-German Karakorum Expedition Vol. 1. Excavations in the Craftsmen Quarter at the Main Road, eds.

J. Bemmann, U. Erdenebat and E. Pohl (Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag, 2010), 63-136.

S. Reichert, Craft Production in the Mongol Empire. Karakorum and its Artisans (Bonn: PhD Diss., 2020).

Medley, The Chinese Potter, 176ff; J. Carswell, Blue and White. Chinese Porcelain around the World(London: British Museum Press, 2000). p. 17.

Sklebitz, Glazed Ceramics from Karakorum, plate 54, fig. 9.

Medley, The Chinese Potter, p. 187; A. D. Brankston, Early Ming Wares of Chingtechen (Beijing: Henri Vetch, 1938), p. 27.

Liu Xinyuan, “Yuan Dynasty Official Wares from Jingdezhen.” in The Porcelains of Jingdezhen. Colloquies on Art & Archaeology in Asia No. 16, ed. R. Scott (London: Percival David Foundation of Chinese Art, 1993), 33-46. p. 37.

R. E. Scott, “Introduction: Qingbai Porcelain and its Place in Chinese Ceramic History.” in Qingbai Ware: Chinese Porcelain of the Song and Yuan Dynasties, ed. S. Pierson (London: Percival David Foundation of Chinese Art, 2002), 6-12. pp. 10-11.

M. Crick, Chinese Trade Ceramics for South-East Asia from the 1st to the 17th Century. Collection of Ambassadorr and Mrs Charles Müller (Milan: 5 Continents, 2010). pp. 190, 206-207; D. Wiesner, Chinesische Keramik auf den Philippinen. Die Sammlung Eric E. Geiling (Köln: Museum für Orien-talische Kunst, 1977). pp. 157-63.

Sklebitz, Glazed Ceramics from Karakorum, p. 87.

R. Kerr and N. Wood, “Ceramic Technology.” in Science and Civilisation in China. Vol. 5. Chemistry and Chemical Technology. Part XII: Ceramic Technology, ed. J. Needham (Cambridge 2004). p. 202.

Sklebitz, Glazed Ceramics from Karakorum, plate 59.

Kerr and Wood, Ceramic Technology, pp. 87-88.