Греймасын үйлдэгч хэмээх ойлголт ба нэгэн монгол өгүүллэг

Main Article Content

Ууганбаяр Г.

Abstract




In this paper, the author discussed the notion of actant and actor which are very popular in literary semiotics structuralism and narrative theory. There are six key actantial roles of functions arranged in three sorts of binary opposition: subject/object; sender/receiver; helper/ opponent. Together the six actants and their organization account for all possible relationships within a story and indeed within the sphere of human action in general. The actantial narrative schema is a simplification of Propp`s seven spheres of action or roles elaborated from a study of the Russian folk tale roles such as those of hero, villain, helper etc. The subject is what wants or does not want to be joined to an object. The sender is what instigates the action, while the receiver is what benefits from it. The helper helps to accomplish the action, while the opponent hinders it. Semiotics uses the term actor to refer to any individual, anthropomorphic or zoomorphic agent, to a group or to an abstract entity such as fate. In semiotic analysis actor has replaced the traditional terms of character or protagonist. Actors individualized and represent concrete figurative elements. On the example of the modern Mongolian love story, Hulan and I by Sengiin Erdene can be thought that the characters Tsamba and Sampil as actors become subject and receiver and Hulan as an actor becomes object and sender.




Article Details

How to Cite
Г., У. (2018). Греймасын үйлдэгч хэмээх ойлголт ба нэгэн монгол өгүүллэг. Acta Mongolica, 17(492), 81–89. Retrieved from https://journal.num.edu.mn/actamongolica/article/view/5653
Section
Articles

References

Греймас А.-Ж. “Размышления об актантных моделях” Французская семиотика:От структурализма к постструктурализму Пер. с фр. и вступ. ст. Г.К. Косикова. Москва: Прогресс. 2000

Греймас А.-Ж. Структурная семантика: Поиск метода Пер. с фр. Л. Зиминой. Москва : Академический проект. 2004

Пропп В. Я. Морфология волшебной сказки. Москва: Лабиринт. 2001

Французская семиотика: От структурализма к постструктурализмуПер. с фр. и вступ. ст. Г.К. Косикова. Москва : Прогресс. 2000

Эрдэнэ С. Хулан бид хоёр Шилмэл өгүүллэгүүд. Улаанбаатар 1988.

Aristotle Poetics in Smith James Harry and Parks Edd Winfield (eds) The Great Critics: An Anthology of Literary Criticism New York: Norton 1951

Chandler D. Semiotics: The Basics . London: Routledge. 2002

Greimas, A . Structural Semantics. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press. [1966] 1983

Greimas A. On Meaning: Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory trans. Paul J

Perron & Frank H Collins. London: Frances Pinter. 1987

Hawkes T. Structuralism and Semiotics London: Methuen 1977

Martin B., Ringham F. Key Terms in Semiotics. Continuum London&New York. 2006

Propp V. Morphology of the Folktale (trans. Laurence Scott, 2nd edn.). Austin: University of Texas Press.[1928] 1968

Rıfat M. Göstergebilimcinin Kitabı. İstanbul: Dűzlem Yayınları.1996

Rıfat M. Göstergebiliminin ABC'si . İstanbul: Say Yayınları. 200916. Rimmon-Kenan Sh. Narrative Fiction, Routledge.2002